Pat Cash--still sexist, still offensive, still clueless
Australian tennis great Pat Cash, in a recent interview for the Belfast Telegraph, said he is "sick of the women whining on" about wanting equal pay. "They need to come into the real world and stop making it such a big issue...they need to stop this crap and live in the real world. They're getting paid a million dollars for winning a tournament and they are moaning."
Cash also said "When I hear about it I just want to tell them to 'shut the hell up!' I think the women are overpaid. To be honest, I think they're all overpaid."
He went on to mock Venus Williams, who has become the spokeswoman for women's rights in tennis, Williams was outspoken this year in her call for equal pay at Wimbledon. The argument generally made against equal pay for women is that men play the best three out of five sets and women play the best two out of three--therefore, men work harder.
There are a couple of things wrong with this argument. First, if women are playing two out of three because they do not have the physical endurance of men, then two out of three for them is the same as three out of five for men. But if women have the endurance to play three out of five, then someone, like the Wimbledon tournament, needs to allow them to. The top women players have repeatedly asked to play three out of five at Wimbledon (the used to play three out of five at the Year-End Championships) and the tournament organizers have turned down their request.
You can't have it both ways: Either two out three for women is the same physical job as three out of five for men, in which case, women should get equal pay. Or if women are stronger than that, they should be granted their request to play three out of five, and get equal pay.
An argument is also made that since tennis is entertainment as well as a sport, the amount of work the WTA players do to promote the sport entitles them to get top pay. There is something to be said for that, but it seems clear to me that the real argument can be won by using logic rather than sexism, which--in the tennis world, and especially at Wimbledon--is called "tradition."
People like Pat Cash are incapable of understanding the flaws in the no-equal-pay "argument" because of their contempt for women.
Cash also said "When I hear about it I just want to tell them to 'shut the hell up!' I think the women are overpaid. To be honest, I think they're all overpaid."
He went on to mock Venus Williams, who has become the spokeswoman for women's rights in tennis, Williams was outspoken this year in her call for equal pay at Wimbledon. The argument generally made against equal pay for women is that men play the best three out of five sets and women play the best two out of three--therefore, men work harder.
There are a couple of things wrong with this argument. First, if women are playing two out of three because they do not have the physical endurance of men, then two out of three for them is the same as three out of five for men. But if women have the endurance to play three out of five, then someone, like the Wimbledon tournament, needs to allow them to. The top women players have repeatedly asked to play three out of five at Wimbledon (the used to play three out of five at the Year-End Championships) and the tournament organizers have turned down their request.
You can't have it both ways: Either two out three for women is the same physical job as three out of five for men, in which case, women should get equal pay. Or if women are stronger than that, they should be granted their request to play three out of five, and get equal pay.
An argument is also made that since tennis is entertainment as well as a sport, the amount of work the WTA players do to promote the sport entitles them to get top pay. There is something to be said for that, but it seems clear to me that the real argument can be won by using logic rather than sexism, which--in the tennis world, and especially at Wimbledon--is called "tradition."
People like Pat Cash are incapable of understanding the flaws in the no-equal-pay "argument" because of their contempt for women.
4 Comments:
coach outlet, new balance, louboutin pas cher, polo lacoste pas cher, nike roshe run pas cher, lululemon outlet, true religion jeans, coach purses, coach outlet, sac guess pas cher, vanessa bruno pas cher, polo ralph lauren uk, kate spade outlet, nike free, burberry pas cher, longchamp pas cher, nike air max, true religion outlet, nike tn pas cher, hollister uk, michael kors, michael kors, north face pas cher, true religion outlet, timberland pas cher, coach outlet store online, nike air max uk, north face uk, nike free pas cher, abercrombie and fitch, hermes pas cher, vans pas cher, converse, mulberry uk, abercrombie and fitch UK, jordan pas cher, nike air max pas cher, michael kors outlet online, nike roshe uk, michael kors uk, ray ban uk, true religion outlet, lunette oakley pas cher, lunette ray ban pas cher, nike air max uk
By oakleyses, at 12:58 AM
golden goose slide
fitflops sale clearance
moncler
air jordan 11
ray ban sunglasses
ferragamo belt
links of london
hermes bag
hermes belt
adidas eqt support adv
By SSSSSS, at 8:05 PM
yeezy shoes
nike air max 97
adidas superstar
off white nike
adidas ultra
fila
off white nike
vapormax
supreme hoodie
supreme new york
By yanmaneee, at 9:57 AM
jordan outlet
off white outlet
kyrie 7
hermes bag
goyard handbag
fear of god
curry shoes
a bathing ape
golden goose
golden goose
By Anonymous, at 10:25 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home