One woman bloggers speaks

I've been doing my best not to get involved in the "women bloggers have nothing interesting to say" bruhaha because the presumption is so ridiculous it doesn't really deserve to be addressed. But just for the hell of it, I did a quick scan of topics I've covered since I began blogging in 2002:
terrorism, the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, free speech, global food aid, AIDS, the Vatican, Howard Dean, factory farming, air and water pollution, sexism in language, violence in America, voter fraud, Jesse Jackson's bigotry, Olympic (men's) tennis, laboratory testing of animals, Juneteenth, Martha Stewart, Ricky Williams, sexism in tennis, Wal-Mart, the Sept. 11 Commission, child abuse, sexual assault in the military, international family planning, No Child Left Behind, and the ongoing lies, hypocrisy, bullying, and Constitution-bashing of the Bush administration. There were other topics, of course, but I caught these right away.

I'm not sure what I need to talk about that will catch the interest of male bloggers, but since I don't give a damn about whose interest I catch, I'll never find out. Because animal liberation is one of my most sacred topics, I already sit on the edge of the Blogosphere. Most liberals, as a rule, want tolerance and kindness to be shown toward everyone, only they don't want to know that chickens were stomped on and thrown up against walls, that hogs' legs were pulled off, and that calves stuffed into tiny pens were force-fed so that they could enjoy their entrees. Likewise, many liberal men couldn't care less about the cultural presumption that women are inferior to men in all ways.

So about the female bloggers controversy: Why did any woman think the 21st Century would be any different from all the others?