Jodi Borrello--a standup comedy star is born

It isn't fair to compare comics with other comics, I know, but sometimes it is helpful in describing their style. If you crossed the manic intensity of Robin Williams (back when he was funny) and the ability to do characters of a Margaret Cho or a Whoopi Goldberg, you would get something like Jodi Borrello, a Louisiana comic who has recently had a national breakthrough, and who deserves to make it to the bigtime. Borrello doesn't have a particular political or sociological agenda like Cho or Goldberg; rather, she is a racanteur supreme, and her major story right now is Hurricane Katrina.

Of course, playing to a Louisiana audience, as she did last night in the "Now I Can Vote" tour concert, had to be a wonderful experience for her. Her routine was rapid-fire, her wit sharp, and her final bit--about how she and her sister found enough medication to get them through the aftermath of the hurricane--was one of the most inspired pieces of standup comedy I've seen in a long, long time.

From the problems of evacuation ("The murder rate in Houston is up 23%; they're killing us--we've gotta come home!") to managing children and dogs when a hurricane comes--Borrello covered it all with side-splitting material. The tears ran down my face the entire evening. If she comes to your town, do not miss her.

An anti-feminist, pro-child abuse, foul-mouthed comic comes to town

Last night I had an experience which made me ask, for the thousandth time: Is all comedy "funny" or is some of it just hostility poorly disguised by jokes? Does my strong political agenda keep me from appreciating the humor of those with whom I disagree? I did my best to keep an open mind during a standup set by Caroline Picard, a Louisiana comic who did not go on tour until she was in her forties.

Picard was appearing as part of the "Now I Can Vote" comedy tour, a title that hints rather strongly at feminism. The other two comics on the bill were Louisiana native Amanda Hebert, a heavily regional comic of minimal talent, and headliner Jodi Borrello, whose appearance was the reason I went to the show.

Picard is a foul-mouthed, gravel-voiced, beer-toting 54-year-old woman who uses her anger to fuel her comedy. She is angry that people these days are "retarded." That kind of anger could make for a great routine; I share some of her sentiments. Picard attacked the over-indulgence of many contemporary parents, and the resulting product: lazy, out-of-shape kids with no imagination.

Her solutions, however, left me cold. Throughout her routine, she longed for the good old days when parents hit their children, sometimes repeatedly. She also disavowed the existence of ADD, which many people do when they are ranting that American children are over-medicated. I happen to agree that American children are over-medicated, but why is it so hard to grasp the fact that that doesn't mean there is no such thing as ADD? And why is it so hard to grasp the fact that having lax parenting skills doesn't mean that the solution is whacking your kids?

Come on, Diane--it's a comedy act. Lighten up. You yourself believe that anything is fair game in standup comedy.

I kept telling myself that, and I do support Picard's right to do standup about any damned thing she likes, but there is a difference between doing one joke about hitting children and making it an obvious theme in your routine. The first is utilizing a comedy opportunity; the second is delivering a message.

One of Picard's other themes was that women could get a man and hold on to a man if they would just "shut up and leave him alone." The assumption behind this part of her routine, of course, is that a woman is desperate to find a man. The other assumption is that a woman is so desperate for a man that she should shut her mouth, cook, have sex, and just let him be "masculine."

Which brings me to a major flaw in Picard's rhetoric: She went on a rant about metrosexuals. Now, had she gone on a rant about the word "metrosexual," I would have enjoyed it, since I so loathe that word. But her rant was about men who cared about their clothing and who used cologne, etc. Now, not all women like men who who care about fashion and haircuts. There are also women who don't wish to be with men who don't care about those things. Something for everyone.

By now, dear reader, you have already guessed what she thinks about so-called metrosexual men--that they are gay. This, of course, is an American obsession (all you need to do is check the tennis boards to see how many Americans think Roger Federer must be gay because he is fashion-conscious). Obviously, such an opinion is idiotic. But in Picard's case, it is also deeply hypocritical. Picard wears "unfeminine" clothes, drags around a bottle of beer, curses constantly, and has a deep, gruff voice. By her own definition, she must be a lesbian.

By the way, whose fault is it that American men have been "feminized"? Why, Gloria Steinem's, of course. Picard fantasized about causing physical harm to Steinem. Since Steinem is the person I admire most of anyone in American life, it became harder and harder for me to "lighten up."

And now, for Picard's gem: "I voted for George W. Bush, and he is the greatest president we could have because he's a man and he acts like a man."

Then she said we should bomb the entire Middle East. Sadly, a number of people applauded. And at that point, Picard gave a new meaning to the term "standup." I stood up and walked out.

Congress had time to approve rape and torture

But not to protect Louisiana's coastline and finally give the state the royalties it has been owed for generations.

Congressman Foley is gone, but the problem remains

Florida Congressman Foley resigned today, after it became public that he had sent inappropriate emails to a 16-year-old Congressional page. There have been rumors about Foley's sexual orientation for some time, and perhaps it is now clear that he is gay, or at least bisexual.

Unfortunately, much of the criticism that will be railed against Foley will be because he is gay, not because he made inappropriate advances to a minor, and to an intern, no less. For Foley to send personal emails to a 16-year-old is a big problem, whether that 16-year-old is a boy or a girl. But if Foley had left the intern alone and had been seen in a bar with a 25-year-old man, he would still have to resign because of this culture's rabid fear of anything homosexual.

I am glad that Foley has to pay the consequences for doing something he should not have done, but I am sorry that his sexual orientation will be looked at as the problem.

How do you make money for an "educational" farm?

You slaughter one of the animals, of course.

Training extremists while they are young

It is probably no more than an ironic coincidence that the Kids on Fire camp is in Devil's Lake, North Dakota. Or perhaps not. Kids on Fire is not your mother's summer camp; rather, it is a place where children--some as young as six--receive instruction in glossolalia, go on field trips to political protests, and learn to chant for "righteous judges" for America.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Friday cat blogging--my coat of many colors

Here is a list of Senators

Who voted to permit the rape and sexual assault of detainees:

Alexander
Allard
Allen
Bennett
Bond
Brownback
Bunning
Burns
Burr
Carper
Chambliss
Coburn
Cochran
Coleman
Collins
Cornyn
Craig
Crapo
DeMint
DeWine
Dole
Domenici
Ensign
Enzi
Frist
Graham
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Hatch
Hutchison
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Lieberman
Lott
Lugar
Martinez
McCain
McConnell
Menendez
Murkowski
Nelson
Nelson
Pryor
Roberts
Rockefeller
Salazar
Santorum
Sessions
Shelby
Smith
Specter
Stabenow
Stevens
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
Thune
Vitter
Voinovich
Warner

Note, for those of you who care about these things, that twelve of them are Democrats, and five of them are women.

Page gets unusual emails from Congressman Foley

Congressman Mark Foley of Florida, co-chair of the Missing and Exploited Children Caucus, brags about co-authoring the overhaul and strengthening of sex offender penalties included in the Adam Walsh Child Safety Act, and he has introduced legislation that would vigorously attack the Internet child pornography industry.

It is of special interest, therefore, that Foley is alleged to have taken a more than average interest in a 16-year-old Congressional page, emailing him to request his photograph, his age, and asking what he would like for his birthday. Foley's office says it keeps pictures of pages so that later, if asked to recommend one for a job, the staff is aware of who is being discussed. The problem is that the boy in question never worked for Foley or his staff.

A matter of interest, to be sure.

Some thoughts on Hewlitt-Packard

It is quite unfortunate that a major company whose top two people were women saw them both fall from grace--Patricia Dunn with an especially loud thump (Carly Fiorina was outsted because the direction she took H-P failed to profit the company). With so few women in key posts like CEO and chairwoman, "putting women in charge" can now be given a bad name.

Perhaps just as contentious is the constant complaining among feminists that when women "make it," the last thing they should do is "act like men," i.e., use power to destroy others, and formulate little autocracies. Put simply, women should not replicate the patriarchy.

This latter issue cuts to the deepest level of radical feminism: Not only is the patriarchy the cause of social ills, but the patriarchy is not necessarily made up of men exclusively. What Dunn did, in particular, demonstrates what can happen when people are given a lot of power. Feminism, as an inevitable change in the quality of women's lives in America, is going to continue, even at its snail's pace. But there is a difference between benefiting from feminism and living a feminist life.

Patriarchy equals corporatism, and until there is some fundamental change in the way America works and does business, the Patricia Dunns--both female and male--will be with us.

Fiorina put together what was considered bad strategy. Dunn was unethical. The only lasting harm that can come of their departures would be for Hewlitt-Packard to stop promoting women. Women are going to make strategic mistakes and are sometimes going to be ruthless in their leadership styles. It is appropriate to blame them for their failures, but it is equally important to not blame women as a whole.

Elizabeth Edwards shows an ugly part of herself to Time

I have little time for John Kerry, as anyone who reads this blog knows. But I also have little time for petty, hypocritical attacks, and Kerry has just received one from Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Kerry's 2004 running mate, John Edwards. From Time's "10 Questions For Elizabeth Edwards":

[referring to Kerry]

I'd be telling you things that weren't true if I said that he didn't have an impediment. He did. He was certainly able to be painted as someone who didn't understand what people did with their free time or what their concerns were when they sat around the table. But I don't think that if you looked at his policies you would have found that to be a fair conclusion.

And in describing her own lifestyle:

It's a different kind of luxury, I think. I know the people whose artwork is on my walls--they're not the old masters. I shop at Target. We eat at Wendy's. Even though we have a lot and I feel very blessed, we are basically the same people we were when we first started out and made, between us, $28,000 a year.

If there's one thing I hate, it's someone with a lot of money who brags about not spending it. Or perhaps John and Elizabeth are just Philistines and like to brag about that. Either way, it was a cheap, nasty attack, and she should be ashamed.

Emeril Lagasse and the Food Network promote foie gras

The Essence of Emeril is not pretty. On September 26, the New Orleans chef used his entire Food Network show to promote foie gras.

The making of foie gras is so cruel that the European Union has banned it (with loud protests from France). So has the city of Chicago, though several Chicago chefs are fighting the ban, and the mayor of Chicago is helping them by ridculing the new law, and by wholeheartedly supporting its repeal. In New York, Governor Pataki has given a large grant to a foie gras manufacturer.

And now along comes Emeril Lagasse to promote some of factory farming's most heinous torture. You can let the Food Network know how you feel here, and you can email Lagasse directly here. Both the network and the chef need to know that not all Americans support this promotion. In fact, Farm Sanctuary research shows that when people are educated about how foie gras is made, 80% of them oppose the product (the other 20%, I don't like to think about).

John Kerry opens his mouth and I cringe--again

Sen. John Kerry wants you to know he knows God. He wants you to know it in the worst way. In yet another tiresome speech about his 2004 mistakes, Kerry told an audience in Malibu all about how he returned to his Roman Catholic faith in 80s, after he had "wandered in the wilderness." He also said he was sorry he had been reluctant to talk about his faith in the 2004 election campaign. "I learned that if I didn't fill in the picture myself," he said, "others would draw the caricature for me. I will never let that happen again...."

No, John. The thing to do is to mightily preserve your right to keep an extremely personal matter personal. The thing to do is to oppose the tackiness of insisting that people expose the most intimate details of their inner lives to idiots from CNN. The Catholics who are anti-choice are not going to vote for you, anyway. The Catholics who are pro-choice (how do they remain Catholics?) can probably see through this charade. And the the non-Catholic fundamentalists think you are going to hell, anyway.

If you want to say that you are a Roman Catholic, okay. I don't like the idea that you feel you have to say it, but okay. But to talk about the most profoundly intimate matters of your life does not solve the problem.

Update: whistleblower sisters sued by their company

Kerri Rigsby and Cori Rigsby, the independent insurance adjusters who blew the whistle on State Farm Insurance's allegedly fraudulent practices following Hurricane Katrina, have been sued by a company that contracts with State Farm.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

The Saints won--enough already

I'll come clean right now and say that I am not a football fan and I never will be. To me, football is an uninteresting, thinly-veiled homoerotic free-for-all accompanied by near-illiterate interviews and commentary.

However, those of you who read this blog know that I do appreciate athleticism, and I totally understand the emotion that accompanies sport. I have postponed a dinner until after a tennis match, postponed most of my life until after a Grand Slam, gone to extraordinary lengths to watch a match on television, and shed tears over losses. I understand the emotions felt by New Orleanians when the Saints gave them an enormous win Monday night, even though I do not share them.

But the carrying on is already, in my opinion, ridiculous. Thousands of New Orleanians watched the game from various parts of the United States because they have not been able to return to their houses, or their houses have disappeared. Many left because they no longer had jobs. Many who stayed have rebuilt their houses, only to look next door and see a pile of trash that is inviting only to rats and termites. There is still debris all over the city, there is a very serious shortage of medical services (including badly needed mental health services), many of the city's landmarks are in almost total disrepair because the federal government has no intention of rebuliding them, and--most important of all--the levees are not safe.

It's okay to get excited over a football victory and the national publicity that surrounds it, but New Orleans has always been viewed as more of a show than a place where people actually live and work. It is beyond me how anyone can think the Saints victory and all that surrounded it can draw tourists when the lead stories in the newspaper every day are about the latest murders and robberies. New Orleans was in bad shape before Katrina, with a high crime rate, signficant poverty, a high rate of child abuse, and the most corrupt and inefficient school board in history. Now we can add to that a lack of services, lack of jobs, and a hyprocritical, swaggering mayor who stumbles and bumbles at every turn.

What's not to feel optimistic about?

White House and Senate versions of detainee bill permit common types of rape and sexual assault

Rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse are mentioned twice in the bill that George W. Bush is trying to rush through Congress, with loopholes to spare. The bill, which deals with the jailing, interrogation and trying of terror suspects, defines rape as "forced or coerced genital or anal penetration." That's it. As the New York Times points out, sex without consent--the type that prisoners undergo frequently--is not mentioned at all.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Some thoughts on internalized sexism

Right here.

Disabled women undergo yet another type of abuse

Depo Provera is a progestin (synthetic progesterone) used by some women as a primary method of birth control. Progestins, though widely prescribed for a number of problems, have long been associated with a plethora of undesirable side effects: headaches, panic attacks, depresion, muscle pain, insomnia, cramping, and on and on. Depo Provera--used over a long period of time-- carries its own particularly nasty side effect: bone loss, which does not necessarily reverse when the drug is no longer injected.

Alas, a Blog reports, however, that Depo Provera is being injected into disabled women in some nursing homes so that the staff does not have to deal with the patients' menstrual cycles. It is against the law to do this: Sanitary napkins are among the supplies that federal law mandates nursing homes to provide to patients.

According to F.R.I.D.A. (Response In Disability Activism), some nursing home patients are using their tiny SSI allowances to buy their own menstrual products, if and when they are allowed to. F.R.I.D.A. has established the Pad Patrol as a way of getting sanitary supplies to disabled women in nursing homes in Chicago. The organization maintains that private help for these patients does not dilute the goal of getting nursing homes to obey the law; rather, it brings the problem to public awareness.

Ben & Jerry's finally does the right thing

After promising for a year to stop using battery cage eggs, Ben & Jerry's--under pressure from the Humane Society of the U.S.--will phase out use of the eggs over a four-year period. The company has also agreed that all of its cage-free eggs will meet the standards of Humane Farm Animal Care.

This is very good news, but this "progressive" company should not have needed this type of pressure to do the right thing. The term "progressive" seems to nearly always exclude concern about non-human suffering.

Back in the Superdome and winning

But da po' blog has what I think is the real story.

Bush's comma

"When the final history is written on Iraq, it will look like just a comma..."

George W. Bush

There has already been quite a bit of discussion about Bush's "comma" remark. Greg Mitchell, writing in Editor & Publisher, suggests it will be more like a period, to replace what he calls the "hopeful" comma. Pedant that I am, I am inclined to agree with Bush, but that is because I actually understand what a comma is. A comma may indicate a pause, which is what Bush was getting at, but a pause cannot exist without the resumption of time and circumstance.

For what might the war in Iraq serve as a pause? Not world peace, for it is nonexistent. Not peace in Iraq, for--despite the horrors of the invasion--it wasn't a bed of roses under Saddam Hussein. Not peace in the Middle East, for it does not exist, either. What the war did interrupt, however, was the sympathy most of the world had toward the U.S. following the attacks of September 11, 2001.

And following the comma will be the next clause, the one in which other nations do not want to hear about the United States' problems or become partners in the United States' international "projects." That will lead to the paragraph in which some emboldened world leaders are bound to notice that there is no war on terror in the U.S. and there never was. None of this will make any difference to the American people (if you believe that Reagan was a great leader, you will believe anything), who are not into reading paragraphs, anyway.

Oh, it's a comma alright. A pause at the brink. The punctuation of a list-maker with multiple tasks.

Deciding which torture to oppose

Torturing prisoners is not only morally objectionable; it is also stupid. Even a person without much intelligence can deduce that someone might lie in order to stop getting tortured, and that those whose prisoners are tortured will be more than happy to torture our soldiers when they are the captives. It just doesn't take a lot of IQ to figure this out.

I believe that so many people back the torturing of detainees because it is sadistic. We like to have a defined "enemy"--never mind if that person has been detained for no particular reason, and never mind that torturing him or her violates the tenets of our more or less state religion.

What I wish is that people of conscience--be they liberal or conservative--who are morally opposed to the torture of detainees would also speak up about the treatment of prisoners in our own country, and about the rampant child abuse in America. And if you want to talk about torture, how about factory farming, an industry that tortures (I use the word literally) millions of helpless cows, sheep, chickens, pigs, ducks, and other animals every day? Why is it okay to sit down to a dinner of baked chicken or hamburger--knowing that the chickens and cows were put through constant, horrific pain and discomfort every day of their lives--but not okay for Americans to use a waterboard technique on detainees?

The mayor of Dallas wants you to breathe freely

But the governor of Texas doesn't give a damn. The coal industry wants to build seventeen more (there are already eighteen) factories in heavily polluted (thank you, George W.) Texas in the next four years, a project that is getting fast-track treatment from Governor Rick Perry. Dallas mayor Laura Miller has put together a coaltion of eighteen Texas mayors who oppose the building of any new coal plants that do not utilize the integrated gasification combined cycle technique. Using this technique cuts air pollution by 70 to 90%.

As you may have already guessed, using integrated gasification would cost the coal industry more money and would take more time. The industry maintains that it can build coal factories today that reduce the old factories' toxic emissions by 20%, which is nice, but it isn't 70 to 90%. Governor Perry says that a delay of any kind would damage the state's economy, and that Miller and her group wish to "return Texas to the era of the horse and buggy." Perry, of course, wants to return Texas to the era of black lung disease.

The federal government does not regulate the emission of carbon dioxide, and the proposed Texas power plants will emit the equivalent of 19 million automobiles' worth of carbon dioxide annually.

Public Expression of Religion Act could become a reality

Last year, the Public Expression of Religion Act was introduced in Congress. This bill would bar the recovery of attorneys' fees to those who win lawsuits asserting their constitutional and civil rights in cases brought under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

McCain, naturally, jumps into the Chavez-is-the-Devil fray

Despite what one may think of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, the rush by Democrats to say as many over-the-top, fundamentally unAmerican things about him as possible set a hysterical precedent. There is no way that Republicans can top the ridiculous rhetoric of Rangel and Pelosi, but if there is an alternate avenue, we know Sen. John McCain will find it.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

FEMA to the rescue!

Having given Elva Galatas a too-small trailer a second time, a FEMA crew arrived last weekend and removed trailer number two. The crew also removed the handicap access ramp and the sewerage pipes and brought in a third trailer for Galatas and her handicapped son, and installed sewerage pipes again.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Get the cream cheese, and plenty of it

What is going on with Amelie Mauresmo? World number one Mauresmo lost the China Open final today, 4-6, 0-6 to Svetlana Kuznetsova. It was 4-all in the first set, and then there was a rain delay. After play resumed, Mauresmo never won another game.

That is strange enough, but today's final marks the fourth time in as many weeks that the world number one has been served a bagel. In her U.S. Open round of 16 match against Serena Williams, Mauresmo dropped the second set at love. And Maria Sharapova, who had never before beaten Mauresmo, took two love sets off of her in their U.S. Open semifinal.

It happens to everyone on occasion. Everyone remembers the double-bagel Sharapova had to eat when she played Lindsay Davenport last year at Indian Wells, marking the first time in history that a top three player failed to win a game in a tour match. But to be number one in the world and get bageled four times in a month is significant. The most likely cause is Mauresmo's poor preparation. She skipped the entire hard court season, and got to the U.S. Open semifinals on the strength of her talent. This was not a good plan, and she should avoid it in the future.

Mauresmo is my favorite WTA player. I waited a long time for her to finally reach her potential, and it is disturbing to see her play so erratically.

Hurricane Rita--a year ago today

A year ago today, Hurricane Rita, a category 4 storm, struck the Louisiana/Texas border, and did $10 billion worth of damage. Because of the nightmare created when the pieces of junk called levees in New Orleans broke, and the pieces of trash in the federal government did nothing, Rita was--to some degree--ignored by the news media and the public. But the losses were devastating.

In Louisiana, the environmental damage alone is a very serious matter. Only 5% of Cameron Parish's residents have returned to the parish, which was once filled with houses, businesses, beaches, and fishing camps. In Texas, many low-income people without insurance saw their houses destroyed by Rita, and it may be years before adequate repairs can be made.

$895 million in federal disaster loans has been approved for the victims of Hurricane Rita, but only $235 million has reached them, though a year has passed.

A look at FEMA today

Elva Galadas is a resident of Lacombe, Louisiana, on the north shore of Lake Pontchartrain. Her house was as good as destroyed by Katrina, leaving her with rotten wood, mold, and "tin roof rusted." Galatas, who is 73, has a son who is paralyzed from the waist down and who has epilepsy. He also has a broken ankle, an injured arm, and a allergies that require him to get daily oxygen treatments.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

On hating Bush

Talking heads like to refer to "the Bush haters"--those who hate Bush so much they cannot even acknowledge when he does something good. As a long-time Bush (the entire BFEE) hater, I have given some thought to this issue. When, I have asked myself, has Bush done something right, or something good?

This does not go over well with many liberals and so-called liberals, but sometimes, I really do enjoy Bush's humor. I have laughed out loud before over things he has said. And even though he currently looks as though he has slept in his clothes for six days, there was a time when I found him well-dressed.

That's about it, I'm afraid. He is ignorant, next to illiterate, bumbling, totally lacking in compassion, greedy, criminal, and without any moral direction, as far as I can see.

Of course, he is also a sock puppet, so that leaves me with the question, "What has Dick Cheney done that is good?"

Nothing. The entire Cheney family creeps me out beyond belief. The fake feminist wife, the daughter with the gargantuan case of internalized homophobia, and Cheney himself, who actually may be worse than Reagan...they are all very scary.

Friday cat blogging--now we are 3!

We don't know the date, but Roxie and Velma were born some time in September. Here is a recent photo of them relaxing in the middle of the sofa with their favorite pillow.

Who makes up these rules?

A few years ago, when the Dixie Chicks' Natalie Maines told a London audience she was ashamed that George W. Bush was from Texas, a lot of the outrage occurred because Maines had "insulted" the "president." But I also heard some people say they supported Maines' right to criticize Bush, but that she shouldn't have said what she said "over there." To these people, it was somehow improper for an American citizen to criticize the country's leader (well, you know...) while on foreign soil.

This made no sense to me at all. Bush is just as dreadful and idiotic a person, whether you happen to be in Chicago or London. It's not a secret, either: The rest of the world knows that he is an ignorant, callous, greedy philistine.

Now, enter Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan leader, loose cannon and drama queen who called Bush "the devil" while he was visiting the United States. Rep. Charles Rangel spoke harshly of Chavez, declaring he had no right to criticize Bush:

You don't come into my country, you don't come into my congressional district, and you don't condemn my president. If there's any criticism of President Bush, it should be restricted to Americans--whether we voted for him or not.

Oh? What a ridiculous notion. Bush isn't my president, and I didn't think he was Rangel's. Bush, as far as many of us are concerned, is not even the president. And, since we pride ourselves on our rapidly disappearing free speech, doesn't that apply to visitors? And why on earth should criticism of Bush be restricted to Americans? Like Reagan, Bush is an internationally meddlesome--and menacing--American leader (I use the term loosely). He has interfered with the people of every continent, bringing about death, homelessness, destruction, and fear.

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi was even worse. She called Chavez an "everyday thug" for making the devil comment. It is not my intention to defend Chavez as a leader; rather, it is my intention to examine thug-like behavior. Attacking a country for no reason, poisoning the environment of your own country, declaring those who dissent to be unpatriotic, participating in tainted elections, and forcing illness and death on African women and children--that, dear readers, is what a thug does.

What Rangel and Pelosi did is what a coward does.

The filibuster--it's okay when Republicans use it

Remember all the threats to use the "nuclear option" when Democrats planned to filibuster Bush's racist, sexist, homophobic judicial nominees? No one was pushing harder for it than Majority Leader Sen. Bill Frist.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Some things that are nice to look at

Here is the peach ginger (I know longer know which variety of peach ginger it is) in full bloom, and above are the buds

My collection of garden misters, some of them reproductions of antique pieces

You bet your ass I'm more afraid of Bush than bin Laden

Right-wing talking heads like to "smear" liberals (or at least, those whom they perceive as liberals) by saying they are "the people who think we should be more afraid of George W. Bush than we are of Osama bin Laden."

Well, I for one am certainly more afraid of George W. Bush than I am of bin Laden. Osama bin Laden, as single-mindedly crazy and filled with hate as he is, did not tamper with two elections in order to make sure he took over my government. Nor did he arrange for the air and water to be poisoned, put American children at risk from lead poisoning, or arrange for the schools to teach that females should be submissive to males. bin Laden did not make me afraid to take photographs in public places or make it easy for Americans to get arrested simply by exercising their First Amendment rights. bin Laden did not cause American soldiers and Iraqi citizens to be maimed and killed for no reason at all. He did not trash decades of scientific research that holds the keys to individual and collective survival. He did not arrange for anyone with half a brain to be called unAmerican. He did not put the country in colossal debt, nor did he determine that he could ignore any law passed by Congress. And it was not bin Laden who set up a climate in which women are dictated to about their health needs by pharmacists who are actively violating their own codes of ethics.

The bin Laden family and the Bush family are close, of course, because of the Carlyle Group. Prescott Bush did business with the Nazis. It is all about money, and it always will be. Millions and millions and millions of dollars were pumped into the campaign of George W. Bush, an ignorant man who had never held a real job, other than being governor of Texas. And he used that job to poison the Texas environment and make pollutors very rich. That was all he needed to do.

So yes, I am a lot more afraid of George W. Bush than I am of anyone else other than the real leader of the country, Dick Cheney, and his pair of goons, Karl Rove and Karen Hughes. Oh...and the Ameican people scare the hell out of me, too.

The company they keep

James Dobson, of Focus on the Family, is well known for his extreme anti-feminist, anti-gay, pro-child- (and dog-) beating, "pro-family" philosophy. Bill Bennet, self-appointed "values" czar, is known for his compulsive gambling problems. Sen. George Allen, who recently came under fire for making racist comments, is also known to have a history of violence. Ann Coulter is known for desiring the death and destruction of a number of non-conservative ("non-conservative" is actually a stretch when desribing the New York Times, but you get my point) citizens. Jerry Falwell blamed gays, feminists and the ACLU for the attacks of September 11, 2001. And Sean Hannity's nightly broadcasts speak for themselves.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Two things I learned today

1. Don't kiss on a commercial airplane--unless you are heterosexual.

2. If you are so socially ignorant that you wish to continually offend female flight attendants by calling them "stewardesses," you can get a job at the "liberal" New Yorker (or the equally "liberal" New York Times, for that matter).

Priest in Manila insults world number one Amelie Mauresmo

Speculating on why Sharapova gave such a beating to Mauresmo at the U.S. Open, Fr. Bel R. San Luis writes "Was Amelie distracted by her opponent's beauty or was her focus not on the ball but on something else?"

There is no way in hell he would have said such a thing about a heterosexual athlete. Not only does the parish priest turned writer take a shot at Mauresmo for being gay, but he also suggests she is so weak-minded that she would let a "pretty girl" (not Sharapova, by the way, in my opinion) keep her from winning the U.S. Open.

Do these priests ever think about anything but homosexuality?

The Finer Points of War

The Finer Points of War
By Diane Elayne Dees

A twelve-year-old boy, kidnapped in Iraq
and held for ransom. The family paid--
his sexually abused body then found
in a plastic bag, hanged by his own clothes.
"This," says CNN's talking head,
"isn't regular warfare--it's barbarism." What I would like
for him to tell me is which part of the whole affair
is regular: the bombing of families in their homes,
the raping of children, the blowing up of buildings?
The murder of members of one's own religion,
the deaths of soldiers through roadside bombs?
What of the torture of prisoners, the abandonment
of veterans, the assaults on our own soldiers by our own soldiers?
I am not schooled in the fine points of atrocity--
where is the expert to tell me whose blood flows
in a regular stream down a street of debris and despair?

Originally published on the Poets Against War website

Get out the ammo--the Katricians are coming

Houstonian Jim Pruett, owner of Jim Pruett's Guns & Ammo, or--as he prefers to call it--your anti-terrorist headquarters--has a radio ad that warns Houston's citizens to arm themselves because the "Katricians"--Katrina evacuees from New Orleans--are going to attack if they do not get more free rent.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Spike Lee documentary has serious omissions

I finally saw When the Levees Broke, Spike Lee's 4-hour HBO documentary on what happened in New Orleans after Katrina made landfall. It is difficult viewing, to be sure; in fact, some of the scenes are horrific.

After the documentary was previewed, there were complaints that it focused only on African Americans. Others who had seen it questioned these complaints, since plenty of Caucasian victims are interviewed, and their stories are told in depth.

The answer lies somewhere in between: Despite the appearance of many white Katrina victims (or, more accurately, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers victims) in the documentary, there is no mention made of the Lakeview section of New Orleans. The white people featured (that is, those who are victims of the storm)--with the exception of one--all lived in the lower ninth ward or in St. Bernard Parish.
Lakeview is almost all white and is a middle class neighborhood with some wealthy sections. And while it is true that the people who live in Lakeview, as a whole, have more resources than the people who live in the lower ninth--nevertheless, many of them lost everything. To drive through Lakeview is not as shocking as driving through St. Bernard or the lower ninth ward, but it is still a scene of devastation.

I think Lee should have included a segment on Lakeview. His defenders say that he had to focus on what he needed to focus on in a given amount of time, but that given amount of time was four hours, and he could have included a major part of New Orleans that was destroyed.

However, that is not my main objection to an otherwise gripping piece of documentary work. The shocker is that in the entire four hours, there is no mention made of the thousands of dogs, cats, birds, horses, and other non-humans who lost their lives and their homes when the levees broke. There is no mention made of the heartbreak people suffered when the government literally threw their pets into the street. There are no scenes of drowning and starving cats and dogs. It is as though the only victims of Katrina were humans.

One big fiesta for immigrants and homosexuals

That's how Vernon Robinson describes America under the leadership of North Carolina Congressman Brad Miller. Robinson, who is running for Miller's Congressional seat, has radio and television ads that are so offensive, they are funny. Not so funny is Robinson's claim that those who are endorsing this campaign or who have endorsed one of his previous campaigns include Sen. Elizabeth Dole, Bill Bennett, the Police Benevolent Association, Governor Jeb Bush, the Wall Street Journal, and the Greensboro News & Record. If some of these endorsers do not endorse the current campaign, they certainly have not rushed to have their names taken off of the list.

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Those lips, those...lips

I don't normally promote commercials, but when M-A-C (which does not test on animals) asks Miss Sandra to do one, well...I make an exception. 100% of the GLAM lipstick and lipglass selling price goes to the M-A-C AIDS Fund.

I left my gun in San Francisco

In 2004, Morgan Quitno Press ranked San Francisco as the ninth safest American city with a population over 500,000, putting it in the top 30%. This apparently did not impress Republican consultant Ed Rollins, who, on Wednesday, declared that House minority leader Nancy Pelosi "comes from San Francisco, one of the bastions of lawlessness in this country."

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

Remembering Ann Richards

Nothing captures the spirit of former Governor Richards better than this.

Schwarzenegger to sign stupid law for which he will be roundly praised

California is about to get a new law which makes it illegal to use a cell phone while driving unless the cell phone is a hands-free type. Every study done has shown that the use of a hands-free cell phone makes no difference at all with regard to safety. Yet liberals are already praising this time-wasting, money-wasting legislation.

Nominee for quote of the year

"It's unacceptable to think there's any kind of comparison between the behavior of the United States of America and the action of Islamic extremists, who kill innocent women and children to achieve an objective."

George W. Bush

Friday cat blogging--spin edition

And you thought the right wing had a spin machine...

Soldiers describe fighting in Afghanistan

American soldiers in Helmand Province have described to journalists from The Independent that "We are flattening places we have already flattened, but the attacks have kept coming. We have killed them by the dozens, but more keep coming, either locally or from across the border....We have used B1 bombers, Harriers, F16s and Mirage 2000s. We have dropped 500lb, 1,000lb and even 2,000lb bombs. At one point our Apaches [helicopter gunships] ran out of missiles, they have fired so many."

(Continue reading at MoJo Blog)

I love it when Landrieu gets angry

For those who didn't see it on TV--Sen. Landrieu, the Senate's resident filibuster specialist, said what needed to be said.